Why imaginary numbers aren’t imaginary at all

wispy i

You’ve probably heard of imaginary numbers. The name alone raises eyebrows. If they’re imaginary, are they even real? Why bother with them?

To understand why imaginary numbers matter, let’s start with the numbers we already know.


A Quick Tour of the Numbers We Use Every Day

We grow up learning different “types” of numbers:

  • Natural numbers: 1, 2, 3, …
  • Whole numbers: 0, 1, 2, 3, …
  • Integers: … −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, …
  • Rational numbers: fractions such as 1/2, 2/3, etc.
  • Irrational numbers: numbers that cannot be written as fractions (π, √2, e, etc.)

Each new category exists because we needed it. Take negative numbers, for example. Why invent those?

Because we needed to represent things like:

  • money owed,
  • temperatures below freezing,
  • direction of motion,
  • solutions of equations that naturally give negative answers.

Negative numbers may feel normal now, but they used to be as strange as imaginary numbers feel today.


The Problem That Imaginary Numbers Solve

Consider this simple-looking equation:

x² + 1 = 0

Solving it gives:

x = √(-1)

But here’s the issue:

No real number, when multiplied by itself, gives a negative result.

So we expand the number system by defining a new number:

i = √(-1)

This isn’t cheating. It’s the same kind of step we took when we accepted negative numbers and irrational numbers. It’s simply expanding the system because reality demanded it.


Do Such Equations Actually Appear in Real Life?

Absolutely. Equations like:

d²y/dt² + y = 0

show up everywhere — in oscillations, springs, pendulums, LC circuits, waves, and vibrations. Their mathematical solutions naturally involve imaginary numbers.

Without i, describing anything that oscillates or rotates becomes unnecessarily complicated.


Putting Imaginary Numbers on the Map: The Complex Plane

Imaginary numbers don’t fit on the usual number line, so we expand the idea:

  • The x-axis becomes the real axis.
  • The y-axis becomes the imaginary axis.

This 2D diagram is the complex plane.

Here’s the beautiful part:

Multiplying by i is the same as rotating a point 90° anticlockwise.

Imaginary numbers aren’t mysterious — they’re simply a mathematical way to encode rotation.


Where Imaginary Numbers Become Essential: AC Circuits

In AC circuits (with resistors, inductors, and capacitors), the “resistance” to alternating current is more than just a number — it includes phase shifts.

For example:

  • Inductors make current lag voltage by 90°.
  • Capacitors make current lead voltage by 90°.

Engineers use j (instead of i, which denotes current) to represent these phase shifts:

  • Inductive reactance: jωL
  • Capacitive reactance: -j/(ωC)

Why can’t we just write ωL and 1/(ωC)?

Because we’d lose the crucial 90° rotation information. The imaginary unit tells us the phase relationship between voltage and current.

This becomes vital when designing impedance matching networks, which maximize power transfer. Without imaginary numbers, the entire field of AC circuit analysis would fall apart.


Imaginary Numbers Are Everywhere

Once you start looking, you’ll find imaginary numbers in:

  • signal processing,
  • quantum mechanics,
  • optics,
  • computer graphics,
  • wave equations,
  • control systems.

And they appear in one of the most elegant equations ever discovered: Euler’s identity.


Euler’s (God) Equation

e + 1 = 0

This single line ties together five of the most important constants in mathematics:

  • e — the base of natural logarithms
  • i — the imaginary unit
  • π — circle geometry
  • 1 — multiplicative identity
  • 0 — additive identity

Imaginary numbers aren’t just useful — they’re fundamental.


Final Thoughts

Imaginary numbers aren’t actually imaginary. They help us describe rotation, oscillation, waves, electricity, and the physical world around us.

Just like negative and irrational numbers, they entered mathematics because reality required them.

Imaginary numbers make your electronics work, your graphics render, your signals process, and your universe make sense.

Nothing imaginary about that!

2 comments

  1. That is exactly my point. You can ‘will’ reality into existence by adopting differrent systems of thought. If you adopt modulo circular numbers as the base (rather than the linear number line), the universe will end at some point and then start over again. Mathematical description determines ontological fate.

  2. Slight change to my eariler comment: That is exactly my point. You can ‘will’ different realities into existence by adopting differrent systems of mathematical thought. If you adopt modulo circular numbers as the base (rather than the linear number line), the universe will end at some point and then start over again. Mathematical description determines ontological fate.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *